Many tennis fans are split on whether a Grass Masters 1000 tournament is needed and how it would impact the current calendar.
Summary
- Debate centers on adding a Grass Masters 1000 or adjusting existing tournaments
- Concerns about timing, capacity, and player schedules if new tournament introduced
- Some suggest prioritizing South America for a Masters event over adding a grass tournament
- Fans express mixed opinions on potential changes to the tennis calendar
Tensions Between Grass 1000 and Existing Tournaments
Opinions on introducing a Grass Masters 1000 range from excitement to skepticism. Some believe that a grass tournament at Masters 1000 level is overdue, with comments like, ‘A grass 1000, long overdue.’ However, others express concerns about the current format and scheduling challenges that might arise.
Debate on Tournament Locations
Discussion also revolves around which existing tournaments should be upgraded to a Masters level. While some fans advocate for Queen’s to become a Masters event, others argue for Halle due to its history and facilities. Capacity issues and prize money considerations are key factors in these discussions.
Prioritizing Grass Season or South America
Some fans suggest that rather than adding a Grass Masters 1000, the ATP should focus on establishing a Masters event in South America. They argue that the region’s players deserve more recognition and support than the current calendar provides.
The diversity of opinions among tennis fans demonstrates the complexity of reshaping the tournament calendar and the passion fans have for the sport. Whether it’s adding a Grass Masters 1000, adjusting existing tournaments, or prioritizing different regions for Masters events, the debate continues to fuel discussions within the tennis community.