College football fans weigh in on which programs should be performing better based on size, location, and resources but consistently fall short of expectations.
Summary
- Miami is seen as a top contender that fails to capitalize on its resources.
- UCLA, USC, and Illinois are cited for underperforming despite their advantages.
- Some fans question the impact of super conferences on program success.
- Texas and Texas A&M are mentioned as programs that should excel given their attributes.
Miami: Missed Opportunities
One user points out that Miami, with its proximity to talent and history of success, should be a perennial powerhouse but has yet to fully capitalize on its advantages.
USC: Golden Opportunities Squandered
Despite being the historically dominant team in the Pac-12, USC has failed to maintain its success post-Pete Carroll, raising questions about their management and strategy.
Conference Impact
As the landscape of college football shifts towards super conferences, fans speculate on how this change may affect the expectations and performance of programs in the future.
Texas & Texas A&M: High Expectations
With ample resources, strong recruiting grounds, and passionate fan bases, fans believe that Texas and Texas A&M should be achieving greater success than they currently are.
Some programs seem to have all the ingredients for success but struggle to reach the heights expected of them, leaving fans to ponder what factors are holding them back.