MLB owners face the dilemma of small stadiums versus maximizing fan engagement and revenue.
Summary
- MLB owners opt for small stadiums to focus on premium seating and higher revenues.
- Large stadiums can lead to poor viewing experiences and challenges in filling seats consistently.
- Smaller stadiums offer a more intimate fan experience and unique design opportunities.
Insights from Fans
Despite initial success with large crowds at expansion team games, MLB owners are cautious about building bigger stadiums due to factors like market demand and viewing experience. Some fans appreciate the intimacy of smaller fields instead of overcrowded venues.
Revenue vs. Fan Engagement
Owners prioritize revenue streams from premium seating and social spaces over raw attendance numbers, leading to a trend in favor of smaller, more revenue-focused stadium designs.
The Big Market Dilemma
While big market teams like LA and NY can reliably attract large crowds, smaller-market teams face challenges in consistently filling massive stadiums, highlighting the importance of stadium size and fan engagement.
The debate on stadium size in MLB remains ongoing, with various factors influencing owner decisions. Understanding the balance between revenue generation and fan experience is key for the future of stadiums in the sport.