Players are left puzzled by USAP’s new paddle test, causing a stir in the community. The lack of transparency from USAP has led to frustration among players, who are unsure about the future legality of their paddles.
Summary
- USAP’s new paddle test lacks transparency and clear guidelines, causing confusion among players.
- Players express frustration over the lack of direct communication from USAP regarding paddle certification.
- Concerns arise about the potential decertification of previously approved paddles without proper explanation.
Controversy Among Players
Many players feel that USAP’s handling of the new paddle test has been poor, with a lack of clear information causing confusion and frustration. One user expressed their annoyance, stating, “This is where USAP is failing. They pushed the cart before the horse. I hate guidelines like these that avoid being specific or setting a clear standard.” The uncertainty around what constitutes an ‘average player’s ability’ has left many players questioning the validity of the test.
Testing Procedures and Results
Speculation arises within the community about the testing procedures, with some suggesting that Coefficient of Restitution (CoR) testing may be involved. However, contradictory information from users like ‘brochaos’ reveals that the testing involves assessing suspicious paddles using PCOR and cutting open older paddles for inspection. The discovery that certain paddles may compress illegally has added to the confusion surrounding the new test.
Consumer Impact
Players are concerned about the potential financial impact on companies like Ronbus due to the unexpected changes in paddle certification. The lack of direct data benchmarks and specific guidelines has not only frustrated consumers but also raised questions about the fairness and consistency of the new testing process.