Certain EVA paddles are under scrutiny for possible removal following CoR testing, sparking debate among players about the future of paddle regulations in the sport.
Summary
- Debate rages on regarding the methods and logic of paddle testing procedures.
- Concerns arise over the lack of communication and transparency from regulatory bodies.
- Questions emerge about the feasibility of monitoring paddles from a large number of manufacturers.
Debate Over Testing Methods
The need for more standardized testing methods, such as robot testing to determine specific speed and spin thresholds, is emphasized by some players who view current practices as inadequate.
Lack of Communication
Players express frustration over what they perceive as the regulatory body’s failure to provide clear information and advance notice to paddle manufacturers, potentially leading to financial losses.
Feasibility Concerns
Players question the practicality of monitoring paddles from hundreds of manufacturers and whether post-approval monitoring occurs outside of professional events.
The uncertainty surrounding future paddle regulations and the lack of clear communication from regulatory bodies contribute to a sense of frustration and apprehension among players.