The KenPom program ratings from 1997 to 2024 have drawn mixed reactions from fans and sparked debates on how teams are evaluated.
Summary
- Fans question the methodology behind incorporating time-weighted success, conference affiliation, and recruiting history into team ratings.
- Some fans appreciate how coaching impacts rankings, highlighting the significance of great coaching.
- Recruits’ influence on ratings raises concerns and confusion among fans, questioning the fairness and accuracy of the evaluation.
Reactions to the KenPom Analysis
There’s a mix of surprise and skepticism among fans towards the KenPom program ratings. One user expressed astonishment at their team’s inclusion despite a shaky history in the early 2000s. This highlights the unpredictable nature of team rankings based on various factors.
For some fans, the incorporation of time-weighted success, conference ties, and recruitment data in the ratings raised eyebrows. They questioned the validity of such metrics in accurately comparing teams over different seasons.
The Impact of Coaching
Notably, fans acknowledge the crucial role of coaching in team success. They attribute the unexpected rankings to exceptional coaching, emphasizing the transformative power of strong leadership on the performance and standing of a team.
Confusion Surrounding Recruits’ Influence
The inclusion of recruits in the ratings sparked confusion and debate. Fans pondered the fairness and logic behind factoring in recruits, questioning how it affects the overall assessment of a team’s performance and potential.
Overall, the KenPom program ratings have stirred varied reactions and discussions among fans, reflecting the complexity and subjectivity of evaluating team success and performance.