Debating between Trout’s stats or Mookie’s titles? Let’s dive into the big question!
Summary
- Is Mookie’s championship success the defining factor?
- Trout’s injuries and lack of playoff contention cast doubt on his legacy.
- Some argue Trout’s individual greatness outweighs team accomplishments.
j1h15233
“Trout was the better player but I played sports to win and Mookie and his teams have done a lot more of that.”
slippin_park
“Trout secured top-10-all-time at his position 8 years in and is probably top-50 among all position players by now. Markus never had quite as high a peak despite clearly being close to Trout as the second-best player in MLB for most of his 11 years. Mook will probably catch up on the counting totals but I’m not sure if that means he’s remembered as better overall down the road.”
Large_Poem_2359
“Mookie. He’s won 2 World Series”
“I would choose mookie. You still get an MVP and are a 2 time champ.”
“I think Mookie will end up being the better career in the end.”
“The only answer is Mookie, Trout isn’t a winner he’s just a ball player.”
“Mookie Wilson hands down, forever tied to one of the craziest ending in baseball history”
“The money”
“Mookie. He’s won 2 World Series”
Debating between Trout’s stats or Mookie’s titles? Let’s dive into the big question!