MLS Fall-Spring Calendar: Pros, Cons, and Fan Reactions

by

The MLS fall-spring calendar debate is heating up, and we’re here to break it all down. This potential MLS schedule change could reshape American soccer. From player transfers to fan experiences, an MLS fall to spring season presents unique challenges and exciting opportunities. We’ll explore the pros and cons of aligning with the international soccer calendar, so join us as we unpack what an MLS fall-spring calendar could really mean for the future of the league.

MLS is considering changing to a fall-spring calendar after the 2026 World Cup
byu/hootjuice_ inMLS

Your Guide to the MLS Schedule

  • MLS is considering a shift to a fall-spring season, aiming for better alignment with global soccer standards.
  • Fans are concerned about playing during severe winter temperatures, especially in northern cities.
  • There is a strong sentiment that this move might reduce attendance significantly and disrupt local summer traditions.
  • Many commenters suggest adjusting the transfer windows instead of overhauling the entire season.

Reflecting on the 2024 MLS Season

League at a Glance

The 2024 Major League Soccer season, the league’s 29th, ran from February 21st to December 7th. This season provides important context for the ongoing discussions about a potential shift to a fall-spring calendar. For a detailed recap of the 2024 season, head over to Wikipedia.

Standout Players and Teams

Inter Miami CF grabbed their first-ever Supporters’ Shield, achieving a record-breaking 74 points. LA Galaxy added another trophy to their case, winning their sixth MLS Cup—a league record. These accomplishments highlight the competitive nature of MLS, a key factor to consider when discussing potential schedule changes. How would a shift to a fall-spring calendar affect the dynamics of the competition? It’s a question worth exploring.

Key Moments and Stats

Across 493 matches, fans witnessed a flurry of goals—1,552 to be exact, averaging 3.15 goals per match. Average game attendance hit 23,371. This number is a central point in the fall-spring calendar debate. Could a change in schedule impact these figures? It’s a concern shared by many.

What’s Up This MLS Offseason?

Roster Changes: Key Dates

Teams are already preparing for the upcoming season, with important dates like the MLS Expansion Draft (December 11th) and the start of Free Agency (December 12th at 10 am PT) fast approaching. These dates are especially important for teams like the Portland Timbers as they work on building their rosters. The Portland Timbers website offers a helpful overview of key offseason dates.

Draft and Scouting Insights

The MLS College Showcase (December 11th-14th) offers a crucial opportunity for MLS teams to scout potential draft picks. This exclusive event allows teams to evaluate up-and-coming talent and plan their draft strategies. A potential move to a fall-spring calendar could also affect the scouting process, adding another dimension to the discussion.

Should MLS Adopt a Fall-Spring Calendar?

The shift to an MLS fall-spring calendar is a hot topic, and for good reason. Proponents argue it offers several key advantages, primarily aligning MLS with the global soccer landscape. This potential change, slated for after the 2026 World Cup, has sparked discussion among everyone, from casual fans to team management. Here at Sir Shanksalot, we’re always keeping an eye on developments that could reshape the sports world, and this is definitely one to watch.

Aligning with Global Soccer

Currently, MLS operates on a spring-to-fall schedule, out of sync with most major soccer leagues worldwide. This misalignment creates challenges, particularly regarding player transfers and international competitions. Aligning the MLS calendar with the global norm could streamline player acquisitions and boost the league’s competitiveness on the world stage. For more on this, check out this piece from The Athletic.

Transfer Window Opportunities

A major argument for a fall-spring calendar revolves around transfer windows. The current MLS schedule clashes with the European transfer window, hindering MLS teams from buying and selling players at the most opportune times. Aligning with the European calendar would give MLS teams more flexibility and leverage in the global transfer market, potentially strengthening rosters and increasing competition within the league. The Athletic delves deeper into this advantage.

Benefits of International Play

Beyond transfers, a fall-spring calendar could also benefit MLS teams in international competitions. Currently, MLS playoffs often overlap with other major American sports, vying for viewership and potentially lessening the impact of MLS’s crucial moments. A shift to spring playoffs could alleviate this overlap, allowing MLS to capture a larger audience and gain more international recognition. This article from The Athletic explores this potential benefit further.

Potential for Revenue Growth

While a fall-spring calendar presents logistical challenges, especially for teams in colder climates, the potential for revenue growth is a significant driver. Increased viewership, a more competitive transfer market, and greater alignment with global soccer could attract more sponsors, investors, and fans. Forbes discusses how a hybrid model could address the unique North American weather challenges, maximizing the benefits of a fall-spring schedule while minimizing disruptions. This potential shift could be a game-changer, and we at Sir Shanksalot are eager to see how it plays out.

Key Takeaways

  • Global alignment vs. fan experience: Aligning with the international soccer calendar offers advantages like smoother player transfers, but it could negatively impact fan attendance, especially in colder climates, during the winter months. Finding a balance is key.
  • Winter weather’s impact on MLS: Games in freezing temperatures present logistical challenges for teams and could deter fans from attending, potentially affecting revenue and the overall atmosphere. The league needs to consider mitigation strategies.
  • The importance of community input: Gathering feedback from fans and players is crucial for the MLS to make an informed decision. This collaborative approach will help the league understand the potential consequences of a schedule change and ensure a thriving future for the sport.

The Current MLS Schedule: All You Need to Know

Currently, the MLS regular season begins in late February or early March and concludes around mid-October. Each team plays 34 games throughout this period. This structure has been in place for years, but as the league evolves, discussions about its format are also changing. For a deeper dive into the current MLS setup, check out the Wikipedia page for Major League Soccer.

Why Consider an MLS Schedule Change?

The main reason for considering a shift to a fall-spring calendar is to better align with the international soccer transfer market. Currently, the summer transfer window—the period when most international player transfers occur—falls right in the middle of the MLS season. This timing presents challenges for MLS teams looking to acquire or release players without disrupting their ongoing season. The Athletic discussed these challenges and the rationale behind the proposed change.

The proposed fall-spring schedule would run from August to December, then pause for a break before resuming in February and concluding with the MLS Cup final in late May. This revised schedule would align more closely with the global soccer calendar, facilitating smoother participation in the international transfer market. This potential shift comes at a time of growing popularity for MLS, spurred by the excitement surrounding the 2026 World Cup and the arrival of star players like Lionel Messi. Goal.com offers a comprehensive analysis of the potential benefits and drawbacks of this change and its potential impact on the American soccer landscape. It’s a worthwhile read for anyone interested in the future of MLS.

Managing a Busy Soccer Season

One of the primary reasons for this potential MLS schedule change is the increasingly packed soccer calendar. Summer months, especially June, overflow with international tournaments like the CONCACAF Gold Cup and the UEFA European Championship. This congestion makes it difficult for MLS to maintain momentum and compete for viewers. It also disrupts the season’s flow with players frequently leaving for international duty. This scheduling conflict is a major headache for the league, as reported by ESPN.

Commissioner Garber’s Vision for MLS

MLS Commissioner Don Garber has publicly acknowledged these scheduling difficulties and the league’s serious consideration of a fall-spring format. ESPN notes his recognition of the need for MLS to better align with the global soccer calendar. However, Garber also understands the potential drawbacks. Playing through the winter months in colder climates is a major concern. The Athletic highlights Garber’s understanding of the balancing act required—aligning with the international calendar while minimizing the impact on fans, players, and the league’s business. The success of any schedule change depends on effectively addressing these concerns.

Increased Viewership and Sponsorship Deals

While a fall-spring calendar presents logistical challenges, especially for teams in colder climates, the potential for revenue growth is a significant driver. Increased viewership, a more competitive transfer market, and greater alignment with global soccer could attract more sponsors, investors, and fans. A hybrid model could address the unique North American weather challenges, maximizing the benefits of a fall-spring schedule while minimizing disruptions, as discussed in this Forbes article.

Attracting Top International Talent

A major argument for a fall-spring calendar revolves around transfer windows. The current MLS schedule clashes with the European transfer window, hindering MLS teams from buying and selling players at the most opportune times. Aligning with the European calendar would give MLS teams more flexibility and leverage in the global transfer market, potentially strengthening rosters and increasing competition within the league. This shift could also make MLS a more attractive destination for top international players looking for a competitive and globally recognized league. The Athletic offers further insights into this potential advantage.

Understanding the Current MLS Schedule

The Current MLS Schedule: All You Need to Know

Right now, the MLS regular season kicks off in late February or early March, wrapping up around mid-October. Each team plays 34 games during this stretch. This format has been the standard for years, but as MLS grows and evolves, so too does the conversation around how the season is structured. For more details about how the current MLS season works, head over to the Wikipedia page for Major League Soccer.

Why Consider an MLS Schedule Change? Addressing the Challenges

The main reason for even thinking about switching to a fall-spring calendar is to better align MLS with the international soccer transfer market. The summer transfer window—that key period for international player transfers—currently sits right in the middle of the MLS season. This timing makes things tricky for MLS teams looking to buy or sell players without disrupting their current season. The Athletic explains these challenges and the logic behind the proposed change.

Managing a Busy Soccer Season and Player Fatigue

Another big reason for this potential MLS schedule change? The increasingly packed soccer calendar. The summer months, especially June, are crammed with international tournaments like the CONCACAF Gold Cup and the UEFA European Championship. This overlap makes it hard for MLS to keep up momentum and compete for viewers, plus it constantly disrupts the season with players leaving for international duty. ESPN covers this scheduling conflict and its effects on the league.

Commissioner Garber’s Vision for MLS and its Global Standing

MLS Commissioner Don Garber has publicly addressed these scheduling issues and confirmed the league is seriously considering a fall-spring format. He gets that MLS needs to be more in sync with the global soccer calendar, as reported by ESPN. But Garber also understands the potential downsides, especially the difficulties of playing through winter in colder cities. The Athletic highlights how Garber recognizes the need to strike a balance—aligning with the international calendar while minimizing the impact on fans, players, and the league’s business. Making this change work hinges on addressing these concerns effectively.

Challenges of a Fall-Spring MLS Calendar

Winter Weather: A Major Hurdle?

Impact on Players and Fans

One of the biggest hurdles for a fall-spring schedule is the brutal winter weather in many MLS cities. Playing in freezing temperatures presents logistical challenges and safety concerns for players. Imagine trying to maintain peak performance with numb fingers and toes! It’s not exactly a recipe for beautiful soccer. Plus, how many fans want to sit in sub-zero temperatures for two hours? Forbes explored how a fall-to-spring schedule could impact colder markets, and it’s a valid concern. Poor attendance could lead to lower revenue and a less vibrant atmosphere, impacting the overall fan experience. The Athletic also highlighted the potential dangers of playing in extreme conditions, something the league needs to address.

Stadium Logistics in Winter

Many MLS stadiums aren’t equipped for winter weather. Frozen turf, icy walkways, and limited visibility could create a dangerous environment for both players and fans. Fan discussions on Reddit echo these concerns. Retrofitting stadiums for winter would be a significant financial investment for many clubs, adding another layer of complexity to the proposed schedule change. Imagine the cost of heated seating, field coverings, and increased snow removal—it adds up quickly.

Competition with Other Sports

Overlapping Schedules and Fan Engagement

A fall-spring schedule puts MLS in direct competition with the NFL, NBA, NHL, and college sports. This overlap could significantly impact viewership and fan engagement. With so many sports vying for attention, MLS risks getting lost in the shuffle. Would fans choose a chilly soccer match over a heated basketball game or a crucial football showdown? The Athletic pointed out this scheduling conflict, highlighting the challenge of attracting fans during peak seasons for other major sports. It’s a tough battle for eyeballs and ultimately, fan loyalty.

Risking Current Success?

Record Attendance and Viewership

MLS is currently experiencing record attendance and viewership. The 2024 season saw an average attendance of 23,371, demonstrating the league’s growing popularity (Wikipedia). A drastic schedule change could disrupt this positive momentum. Fans have established routines and traditions around the current schedule—think tailgating, summer evenings at the stadium, and weekend watch parties. Shifting to a fall-spring calendar could alienate some fans and potentially impact the league’s growth. It’s a risk the MLS needs to carefully consider.

The proposed schedule, running from August to December with a break before resuming in February and concluding in late May (The Athletic), is a significant departure from the current norm. While aligning with the international calendar has its advantages, the potential disruption to the current fan base and established routines is a serious consideration for the league. Is it worth sacrificing current success for potential future gains? That’s the million-dollar question.

MLS and International Soccer Alignment

One of the driving forces behind the proposed calendar change is the desire for MLS to align its schedule with the rest of the world. Currently, MLS operates on a spring-to-fall calendar, creating a disconnect with international competitions and transfer activities. A commenter noted, “I wouldn’t mind this so we’re on the same schedule as the rest of the world, but I’m just picturing empty stadiums as teams play in 10-degree weather during the cold months.” It’s an interesting point: while standardizing the calendar can open doors to global engagement and marketing, it may also lead to unfilled seats during winter matches. No one wants to watch their beloved team while bundled up in layers, shivering as they cheer on their favorite players.

Pros of an Aligned MLS Calendar

Aligning the MLS calendar with the international schedule offers some compelling advantages. Think smoother international breaks—no more pulling key players mid-season for international duty, which disrupts team dynamics and frustrates fans. This shift would also streamline player transfers. The current summer transfer window falls right in the middle of the MLS season, making it difficult for teams to manage buying and selling players. A fall-spring schedule would sync with the global transfer market, giving MLS teams a more competitive edge.

Cons of an Aligned MLS Calendar

While global alignment sounds good in theory, there are significant downsides. This change impacts all levels of American soccer, not just the MLS, potentially creating logistical challenges for youth leagues, college soccer, and even lower-division professional leagues, as discussed by Goal.com. Winter games present another hurdle. Teams in colder climates could face difficulties with winter games and training, potentially impacting player performance and fan attendance, as The Athletic points out. Summer is prime time for outdoor sports, and a schedule shift could disrupt established summer traditions and potentially impact ticket sales for teams who do well in warmer months.

Proposed MLS Schedule Changes: What to Expect

So, what exactly are the proposed changes? A few different models are being floated, and they each have their own quirks and potential benefits (and drawbacks). Let’s take a closer look.

The NY Times on the MLS Calendar Debate

The New York Times, citing The Athletic, reports that MLS is seriously considering a switch to a fall-to-spring format, potentially kicking off in 2026. This model envisions a season starting in early August and running until mid-December. Then, after a five-week winter break, play would resume in early February and culminate in the MLS Cup final in late May. This structure aims to align the MLS season more closely with the European soccer calendar, potentially simplifying player transfers and international competition scheduling.

Learning from the Danish Superliga

Forbes suggests a different approach, taking inspiration from the Danish Superliga. Acknowledging the brutal winter conditions in many northern MLS cities, this model proposes a longer winter break—over two months—during the coldest part of the year. This extended pause aims to mitigate the challenges of playing in freezing temperatures and heavy snow, which could impact both player safety and fan attendance. Can you imagine cheering on your favorite team in a blizzard? This model tries to avoid that scenario.

Leagues Cup and Schedule Alignment

Another key consideration revolves around the Leagues Cup. Forbes also discusses holding the Leagues Cup in warmer locations during the winter break. This strategic move would provide teams with valuable game time during the off-season while avoiding the harsh winter weather up north. It’s a smart way to maintain momentum and offer compelling matchups for fans without the weather-related downsides.

Will Winter Weather Affect MLS Attendance?

Many fans expressed legitimate concerns about how winter weather would impact attendance. A passionate supporter from Minnesota lamented that “you cannot safely play outdoor soccer in Minnesota between basically December and March,” suggesting that if matches were held during these months, attendance would likely decline substantially. Another commenter chimed in, stating that switching to a winter calendar “would absolutely destroy attendance.” They reasoned that during the coldest months, the stadium atmosphere would be starkly different, potentially demotivating fans from attending. The image of fans huddling in stadium seats while sipping hot cocoa instead of enjoying balmy summer evenings truly paints a grim picture for the league’s finances and fan engagement.

Winter Weather Challenges for MLS

Fans’ concerns about freezing temperatures extend beyond personal comfort; they represent a real challenge for cold-weather teams. Northern teams are worried about the impact of frigid weather on games and the overall fan experience, a concern highlighted in a Forbes article. Imagine dedicated supporters in Minnesota braving sub-zero temperatures to cheer on their team. One fan, commenting on a Reddit discussion, pointed out the impracticality of playing outdoor soccer in Minnesota between December and March. Such brutal conditions could lead to a significant drop in attendance, impacting team revenue and overall league enthusiasm. Another commenter echoed this sentiment on the same Reddit thread, predicting that a winter calendar “would absolutely destroy attendance,” painting a bleak picture of empty stadiums and a diminished atmosphere. This raises the question: is aligning with the international calendar worth the potential cost of alienating a portion of the fanbase?

How Can MLS Adapt to Winter Conditions?

While the challenges are significant, potential solutions are being explored. The Forbes article suggests a modified, split season with a longer mid-season break to avoid the harshest winter months, proposing a six-week break from late December to mid-February. Playing daytime matches during the winter months is another idea, taking advantage of slightly warmer temperatures and making conditions more bearable for fans. While these adjustments might help, the core issue remains: winter sports in certain regions present unique obstacles. Finding a balance between aligning with global soccer standards and ensuring a positive fan experience, regardless of the weather, is crucial. The Athletic reminds us that aligning with the global soccer transfer market is a primary driver for this change, a critical factor for the league’s continued growth and ability to compete on an international level. However, the league must weigh this benefit against the potential impact on its dedicated fans in colder climates.

Daytime Games: A Solution for Winter?

One strategy to lessen winter’s impact on MLS attendance is prioritizing daytime kickoffs. As Forbes notes, using the slightly warmer daytime temperatures could make games more bearable for fans. This small change could significantly affect fan comfort and attendance. A crisp, sunny winter afternoon at the stadium sounds much more appealing than a frigid evening game. This approach could especially help teams in northern cities with harsher winters. While daytime kickoffs might not eliminate all winter weather challenges, they could make attending games more pleasant, encouraging fan support.

The Impact on Youth Soccer and Lower Leagues

While the focus remains on how a fall-spring calendar would impact MLS, it’s crucial to consider the ripple effect on youth soccer and lower leagues. These levels of play are vital to the overall health of American soccer, and any significant changes to the MLS schedule could have unintended consequences. Think of it like a delicate ecosystem—a shift in one area can impact the entire system.

Potential Disruptions to Development Programs

Currently, many youth soccer programs structure their seasons around the existing MLS calendar. A shift to a fall-spring schedule could create conflicts, particularly with scheduling games and training. This could force young players to choose between their club team and high school soccer, or lead to overbooked fields due to overlapping seasons. This potential disruption is a valid concern, highlighting the potential logistical challenges for youth leagues and even college soccer. The proposed fall-spring schedule, running from August to December with a break before resuming in February and concluding in May (as reported by The Athletic), represents a significant shift that could require substantial adjustments at the youth and collegiate levels. This raises questions about how these organizations will adapt and what resources they’ll need to manage these changes effectively.

Opportunities for Collaboration and Growth

Despite the potential disruptions, a fall-spring calendar also presents opportunities for increased collaboration between MLS and youth programs. A more synchronized schedule could facilitate joint initiatives, such as shared training facilities and coordinated events, leading to enhanced player development pathways. Imagine a future where young players have more opportunities to train with professional coaches and learn from established MLS players. This closer relationship could also increase visibility for young talent, creating a more robust and interconnected American soccer ecosystem (Goal.com). If implemented thoughtfully, with careful consideration for the needs of all stakeholders, this change could ultimately benefit all levels of the sport, from aspiring youth players to professional athletes.

How a Spring-to-Fall Schedule Impacts MLS

Switching to a fall-spring calendar could mean an influx of scheduling conflicts with other major sporting events. As one user highlighted, “Fall to spring is the most congested sports period.” With the NBA playoffs, NHL playoffs, and the onset of the MLB season all coinciding with an early MLS playoff schedule, the competition for viewer attention in such a packed sports calendar could further dampen fan interest. Other commenters underscored the necessity of evaluating these timing overlaps more carefully to avoid getting lost in sports noise. The potential for diluted viewership ratings during peak times poses a serious challenge for the league’s growth.

Summer Revenue and the Fan Experience

Summer is traditionally a lucrative period for many MLS teams. Shifting the season could directly impact ticket sales and overall revenue during these peak months. This change aims to alleviate conflicts with other major sports during the fall, but it also presents a risk, according to reporting by The Athletic. Summer offers fans a comfortable and enjoyable way to experience live soccer. Trading breezy summer evenings at the stadium for frigid winter nights isn’t ideal for families and casual fans. This shift could also disrupt established summer traditions and impact local businesses that thrive on game-day traffic.

The Importance of Fan and Player Feedback

It’s encouraging to see that MLS is actively seeking feedback from fans and players before making such a significant decision. The league is conducting surveys and focus groups to understand the potential impact of this change. Gathering this data is crucial for making an informed decision that considers not only the international soccer landscape but also the unique circumstances of the American sports market. Fan and player satisfaction are essential for the long-term health and success of the league. It will be interesting to see how the MLS incorporates this feedback into their final decision. Perhaps they’ll find a compromise that addresses both the desire for global alignment and the practical concerns of fans and players. For more diverse sports opinions and analyses on similar topics, check out SirShanksAlot.com, a site covering everything from humorous sports anecdotes to in-depth discussions on current events in the sports world.

Could MLS Transition to a Fall-to-Spring Calendar?

Amidst the wave of cautious skepticism, some fans suggested alternatives to a full season overhaul. A thoughtful commenter proposed flexibility in MLS transfer windows rather than abandoning the summer season altogether. “If the concern is the transfer windows, the easy solution is just to make the MLS windows more flexible, not having teams play in snow,” they mentioned. This solution suggests that instead of disrupting the entire calendar, the league could adapt existing systems to cater better to the needs of international markets while preserving the engaging summer soccer experience that fans cherish.

The intricate ballet of maintaining a competitive soccer league amidst a packed sports calendar while also ensuring fan attendance and engagement is no small feat. Several commentators shared a hopeful yet realistic approach: they expressed a desire for alignment with global standards but cautioned against losing the unique identity and engagement that summer soccer brought to communities across North America. As the MLS weighs its options, one thing is clear: the conversation will continue, as passionate fans rally around the sport they love and the type of experience they desire.

Research and Feedback on the MLS Calendar

It’s encouraging to see that MLS is taking a measured approach to this potential shift, actively gathering input from fans and players through surveys and focus groups. This direct engagement with stakeholders is crucial. They’re the heart and soul of the league. Consulting with team owners and sporting directors ensures everyone has a voice at the table. This collaborative approach suggests that MLS is committed to making an informed decision, not a hasty one. Hopefully, this transparency will lead to a solution that benefits everyone involved.

A Fall-to-Spring MLS: The Right Choice?

The potential upsides of a fall-spring schedule are clear: better synergy with European leagues, smoother integration with FIFA international breaks, and the potential to attract top international talent. These are compelling arguments, and it’s easy to see why MLS is seriously considering this change. However, the potential downsides are a bit murkier. Disrupting the American soccer ecosystem is a valid concern. What impact would this have on lower leagues, youth development programs, and the overall fan experience? These are complex questions that require careful consideration.

Record Numbers: Implications for an MLS Calendar Shift

MLS has come a long way. From its early financial struggles to its current record attendance and revenue, the league has experienced remarkable growth. This success is a testament to strategic decisions like building soccer-specific stadiums, implementing the Designated Player Rule, and securing lucrative TV deals. This context is important. Any calendar change must consider the potential impact on this hard-earned success. Will a shift to fall-spring jeopardize the positive momentum MLS has built? It’s a question the league must grapple with as it moves forward.

Understanding MLS: Structure and History

Single-Entity Ownership Explained

Major League Soccer (MLS) operates under a unique single-entity structure. This means the league owns all the teams, while individual investors operate them. This system differs from leagues like the NFL or NBA, where each team has an independent owner. This structure gives MLS centralized control over player salaries and helps maintain financial stability, which was particularly important during the league’s early years. However, this single-entity system can also lead to debates about competitive balance and whether certain teams receive preferential treatment.

Promotion and Relegation in MLS

A key difference between MLS and many international soccer leagues is the absence of promotion and relegation. In most soccer leagues worldwide, the worst-performing teams in the top division are relegated to a lower division, while the best teams from the lower division are promoted. This system creates high stakes and constant drama. However, MLS teams don’t face this pressure. While this provides stability and allows for long-term planning, some argue it reduces the excitement and competitive intensity of the league.

MLS: A Brief History

MLS was founded in 1993, tied to the United States hosting the 1994 World Cup. The league’s early years were challenging, marked by financial instability. However, MLS has experienced significant growth, thanks in part to the development of soccer-specific stadiums, creating dedicated venues for soccer fans. The introduction of the Designated Player Rule also played a crucial role, allowing teams to sign star players like David Beckham, which boosted the league’s profile and attracted new fans.

Key MLS Stats and Facts

League Expansion: The Future of MLS

MLS currently comprises 30 teams—27 in the U.S. and 3 in Canada. The league continues to expand, with plans to reach 32 teams soon (source). This expansion reflects the growing popularity of soccer in North America and demonstrates the league’s ambition to become a major player on the global soccer stage. New teams bring new rivalries and expand the reach of the league, engaging more fans across the continent.

MLS Records and Achievements

The LA Galaxy holds the record for the most MLS Cup titles, having won the championship 6 times. They share the record for most Supporters’ Shields (awarded to the team with the best regular season record) with D.C. United, each having won it 4 times (source). These two teams have consistently been at the top of the league, showcasing their long-term success and establishing themselves as MLS powerhouses.

The Apple TV Deal and its Impact on MLS

A major development for MLS was the 10-year deal with Apple TV, starting in 2023. This agreement made Apple TV the primary broadcaster for all MLS matches, making games more accessible to fans than ever before. This partnership has broadened the league’s reach, allowing fans to watch games easily on their devices, regardless of location. This accessibility is key for growing the sport and attracting a new generation of fans.

MLS Attendance: A Global View

MLS consistently ranks high in attendance among North American sports leagues. In 2022, it had the fourth-highest average attendance, demonstrating the league’s strong fan base and the growing interest in soccer across the continent (source). This consistent attendance growth is a positive sign for the league’s future and its ability to compete with more established sports in the region.

What Do the Fans Think?

Fan Feedback on Social Media and Forums

The chatter around the potential fall-spring calendar switch has been passionate. Fans have voiced strong opinions across social media and online forums, focusing heavily on the impact of winter weather. Many, especially in northern cities, are worried about how freezing temperatures will affect game attendance. One commenter from Minnesota put it bluntly: “you cannot safely play outdoor soccer in Minnesota between basically December and March” (Forbes). Another echoed this, arguing that a winter calendar “would absolutely destroy attendance” and drastically change the stadium atmosphere (Forbes). It’s a valid point—nobody wants to be a popsicle while watching a match.

Beyond the weather, fans are also calling for more community input. They want the MLS to actively gather feedback through surveys and focus groups to fully understand how this change could impact the fan experience. After all, fans are the heart of the league; their perspectives matter.

Sir Shanksalot’s Take:

Here at Sir Shanksalot, we’ve covered our fair share of fan reactions to major sports developments, and this proposed MLS calendar shift feels significant. While aligning with the international soccer calendar offers clear advantages for player transfers, we can’t ignore the potential impact on fan experience. Think frigid winter matches and competition with other major sports leagues. We’ve seen how passionate fans can be, like when we covered the Ohtani ball auction controversy, and we expect similar fervor around this issue. It’s a delicate balancing act, and we’re interested to see how the MLS addresses these competing interests. A thriving league needs both competitive teams and engaged fans.

Your Take on the MLS Calendar

Now, it’s your turn! What are your thoughts on this potential MLS schedule change? Is aligning with the international soccer calendar worth the potential risks to attendance and fan engagement? Are there other solutions, like adjusting the transfer windows, that could work? Let us know in the comments. We love hearing from our readers here at Sir Shanksalot. And while you’re here, check out our other articles covering a range of sports topics, from fan reactions to team relocations to lighter sports stories. We’ve got something for every sports fan.

Related Articles

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is MLS considering changing its schedule?

The primary motivation behind the proposed change is to align the MLS season with the international soccer calendar. This would make it easier for MLS teams to manage player transfers during the international transfer windows and simplify scheduling around FIFA international breaks. Currently, these windows and breaks disrupt the MLS season because it runs on a different schedule than most other major soccer leagues.

What are the main concerns about a fall-spring schedule?

The biggest worry revolves around playing games during the winter months, particularly for teams located in northern cities with harsh weather conditions. Fans are concerned about attending games in freezing temperatures, and there are questions about how the weather will affect player performance and the quality of play. There are also concerns about potential conflicts with other major sports leagues during the fall and spring, which could impact viewership and revenue.

What are the potential benefits of aligning with the international calendar?

Aligning with the international calendar could make it easier for MLS teams to acquire and sell players during transfer windows, as they would be operating on the same schedule as other major leagues. It could also simplify scheduling around FIFA international breaks, minimizing disruptions to the MLS season. Some believe this alignment could raise the profile of MLS globally and attract more international talent.

What are some of the proposed solutions to address winter weather concerns?

Several ideas have been floated to mitigate the challenges of winter weather. These include a longer mid-season break to avoid the harshest conditions, playing more daytime games during the winter months to take advantage of warmer temperatures, and potentially using indoor stadiums for some games. However, finding a solution that works for all teams and satisfies fans in different climates will be a challenge.

What role do fans and players have in this decision?

MLS is actively seeking feedback from fans and players through surveys, focus groups, and other channels. This input is crucial for understanding the potential impact of a schedule change on various stakeholders. The league’s willingness to engage with fans and players suggests they are committed to making a decision that considers the needs of everyone involved, not just the business interests of the league itself.