MLB fans are hotly debating whether there should be only one MVP for a season. Some fans argue that it’s all MLB and therefore should only have one MVP, aligning with how other leagues operate. On the other hand, traditionalists believe that the historical separation of leagues justifies having two MVPs.
Summary
- Debate rages on whether MLB should have one or two MVPs.
- Fans argue for unity versus historical convention.
- Opinions range from indifference to strong opposition.
Opinions on Unity
Some fans like ‘IanMaIcolm’ emphasize that MLB is one entity and should have a single MVP, akin to other major leagues. They see the current dual MVP system as unnecessary division.
Traditionalist Viewpoints
‘NZafe’ points out that historically, the two leagues had distinct rules, justifying separate MVPs. They argue that tradition and unique league characteristics should be respected.
Passionate Responses
‘LurkerKing13’ finds the debate amusing and questions the intensity some fans have over the MVP issue. Meanwhile, ‘RevolutionFast8676’ holds a more aggressive stance with a curt ‘Fuck off.’