Crawford’s ranking of college football’s 50 all-time best playmaking duos has ignited a fiery debate among Reddit users. From iconic duos to controversial omissions, the list has stirred up passionate discussions.
Summary
- Users express skepticism towards the list’s validity due to its 247 link format.
- Debates arise over which duos were carried by a single player versus a true partnership.
- Some users deem the absence of certain iconic duos as a robbery, questioning the list’s credibility.
- Recency bias and lack of representation for G5 duos are points of contention among users.
Iconic Duos and Controversial Omissions
Some users voiced discontent with the inclusion of certain duos, suggesting that the rankings were skewed towards more recent pairings, neglecting legendary partnerships from college football’s earlier years.
Debate Over Partner Contributions
Discussions emerged regarding the balance within playmaking duos, with users deliberating on whether some partnerships were truly equal in contributions or if one player overshadowed the other.
Recency Bias and Lack of Representation
Users highlighted a perceived bias towards recent duos and a lack of recognition for Group of Five (G5) programs, reflecting concerns about the list’s scope and inclusivity.
The fervor surrounding Crawford’s rankings illustrates the passion and knowledge base of the Reddit community, offering diverse perspectives on the history and impact of college football’s playmaking duos.