Players discuss the shifting queue system in pickleball courts where games move westward after each match. Is it smooth sailing or a disruptive disaster?
Summary
- Opinions on shifting queue system vary based on court layout
- Some see it as efficient for quick game turnover
- Others find it disruptive, especially during competitive matches
- Feedback suggests the system works well at certain locations
Players’ Experiences
In tournament or league play, the system could be disruptive since players may need to shift multiple times at different stages of the game. However, for recreational open plays, the concept of moving to adjacent courts may help maintain a steady game flow.
Some players appreciate the efficiency of the system, noting that it prevents interruptions and encourages faster game turnover. Others find it manageable as long as the court layout allows minimal movements.
Smooth Transition?
Players at cramped facilities have accepted shifting between points as a norm. Moving over after a rally doesn’t hinder gameplay significantly, making the adjustment seamless for most individuals.
Efficiency Over Disruption
Embracing the idea of shifting queues, some players highlight its benefits in terms of expedited game transitions and reduced disturbances from players crossing behind active courts. This approach proves to be more time-effective compared to conventional wait-and-replace methods.