Recent post reveals Oregon’s N’Faly Dante denied additional NCAA eligibility. Ducks appealing decision. Fans divided.
Summary
- Fans debate fairness of NCAA decision on N’Faly Dante’s eligibility.
- Some argue for additional year due to injury-shortened seasons.
- Others believe rules should be upheld, pointing to his age compared to peers.
Fans’ Reactions
One user points out potential antitrust issues if eligibility limits deemed unfair.
Another recalls Dante’s standout performances despite challenges.
Eligibility Debate
User questions basis for requesting extra eligibility if standard 4-year term completed.
Comparison made to peers who have progressed to pro careers.
Final Thoughts
Debate continues whether Dante should receive special consideration or adhere to NCAA rules.