The Reddit post titled “I really enjoy seeing old Big Ten teams beat the shit out of new B1G teams” by andrewlpierce has sparked quite the conversation among basketball fans. It seems that there’s a historically rooted rivalry where older Big Ten teams are relishing in their ability to dominate newer teams such as Rutgers and Maryland. The comment section is filled with mixed sentiments, from savage humor to defensive retorts from newer members of the Big Ten, revealing a deeper narrative about loyalty, pride, and the bitter taste of competition within the league.
Summary
- There’s a strong sentiment from some old Big Ten fans who seem to take a certain joy in the struggles of newer teams.
- This discussion highlights the tension between seasoned members of the conference and the recently added programs.
- Many commenters shared their reactions, ranging from playful jabs to serious defenses of the newer members.
- The responses showcase a mix of nostalgia, rivalry, and a bit of humor in the ever-changing dynamics of college basketball.
The Rivalry Factor
The core of the discussion rests on the nuanced relationships between teams in the Big Ten, especially the established squads like Michigan and Indiana compared to their younger counterparts. As one user quipped, “Just good ol fashion hazing to the new guys! Welcome to the club!” This hints at a playful yet competitive spirit fueled by tradition, indicating that rivalry is not just about winning but about the pride of doing so with a historical badge of honor. New teams like Rutgers and Maryland may have been welcomed into the fold, but the esteem associated with older teams creates an uneven playing field, whether it be in competition or fan support.
Mixed Responses from Fans
The post drew a blend of humor and defensiveness as fans chimed in. One commenter remarked, “Not only did we get our shit kicked in, apparently the Big Ten fans don’t like us. Brutal.” This highlights how the feeling of being the underdog can come with its own set of challenges and frustrations. Other users pointed out that Rutgers, for example, has been a part of the conference since 2014, indicating that while it might be newer, it has existed long enough to start forming a backbone against the critiques. This conversation suggests a longing for acceptance among newer teams while older programs bask in the glow of their historical contexts and apparent dominance.
Camaraderie Among Old Timers
<pThe nostalgic bonds shared between old Big Ten teams and their fans have made it easier for these supporters to rally around perceived injustices against newer entrants. It appears there is a sense of unity among the old guard, with fans cheering louder for their teams' victories over the newer ones. One user even remarked on the conditioning of the modern teams to the harsh realities of conference play, implying these teams are merely learning the ropes. Yet, it’s fascinating to see how that rallying cry can sometimes border on exclusion, with some fans keeping the new teams at arm's length as if they are outsiders trying to break into a well-established fraternity.
The Evolution of the Big Ten Conference
<pAs the Big Ten has expanded over the years, it is clear that its identity has evolved. This transition has been met with mixed feelings, as older fans ponder the implications of these changes. While new additions bring fresh talent and rivalries, they also stir up feelings of nostalgia and tradition among long-time supporters. Commenters seem split between enjoying the competitiveness that new teams bring and lamenting the changes to the conference's traditional dynamics. As one commentator challenging a jab about new teams said, “I guess you didn't watch the Oregon game?” pointing to the idea that newer teams can still prove their mettle and demonstrate the unpredictability of college sports.
.