The NFL’s argument of juror bias in the Sunday Ticket case is facing criticism within the legal realm.
Summary
- The NFL’s claim of bias based on a juror’s Sunday Ticket subscription is seen as flawed.
- The timing of raising bias concerns after the verdict is a key point of contention.
- The failure to use a peremptory challenge is questioned as a legal error.
Is the Foreperson Relevant?
The argument questions the relevance of the juror becoming the foreperson, emphasizing the focus on jury selection.
Appeal of the Argument
The perceived appeal of the NFL’s argument is discussed, highlighting potential implications for future cases.
Legal Oversight
The failure to utilize the peremptory challenge is viewed as a critical legal misstep by the NFL.
MisterBadIdea2 pointed out, “NFL thought this person was biased, they should have said something when he was picked.” The hindsight questioning NFL’s strategy indicates a sense of oversight in addressing potential biases during the jury selection process.
aedan356 elaborated on the case specifics, shedding light on the financial stake allegation and the dynamics of jury composition. This helps in understanding the intricacies surrounding the bias accusation and its legal implications.
phoenix019 humorously noted the website’s font size, adding a lighter tone to the serious legal discourse surrounding the NFL’s argument.
The critique on the font size by phoenix019 offers a humorous break in the intense legal discussion, showcasing the diverse reactions to the legal complexities at play.