A proposed bill requiring UNC and NC State to play each other and other in-state public universities in football and basketball sparks a debate among fans.
Summary
- Fans debate whether legislation should mandate UNC and NC State to play in-state schools, restricting program mobility.
- Some fans express disappointment with the bill, preferring different permanent matchups.
- Questions arise about the reasons behind not passing the legislation, speculating on conference affiliations.
- Supporters of the bill argue for promoting local rivalries to enhance competition and fan engagement.
Fans’ Reactions
RollTide16-18 believes that forcing UNC and State to play in-state schools may limit program growth. ‘…forcing them to play via legislation is going to heavily restrict the upward mobility of both programs,’ they share.
dkviper11 sarcastically remarks his trust in government interventions when discussing the issue.
Jyingling21 expresses frustration at the missed opportunity for different permanent matchups, particularly involving Appalachian State.
Support for Local Rivalries
p-wing rallies for local competition, suggesting that enforcing the matchups would reignite the conference’s spirit.
blondbeans questions the motives behind not passing the bill, speculating on UNC’s conference affiliation and potential future moves.
somethingsimple1290 points out UNC’s dominance against ECU, highlighting a recent winning streak to support the debate.
The proposed legislation to mandate UNC and NC State to face off in football and basketball stirs up a mix of excitement, disappointment, and speculation among fans. As discussions continue, the importance of local rivalries and program growth remain at the forefront, showcasing fans’ passion for the game and their teams.