Navigating the NCAA Rules on Scheduling Non-D1 Opponents in Basketball

In the world of NCAA basketball, the rules for scheduling Non-D1 opponents can be a bit murky. How do these games affect teams and their standing? Let’s dive into the discussion.

Summary

  • Non D1 games count towards records but not computer numbers or tournament resumes.
  • Schools often schedule smaller opponents for morale boosts rather than strategic advantages.
  • Playing too many D2 schools can negatively impact your RPI.
  • Conferences may have their own rules regarding Non-D1 games.
  • In the FBS, only one FCS opponent and no D2 schools can be scheduled for bowl eligibility. The rules in basketball are not as clearly defined, leading to varied approaches and perspectives.

    Insights from the Reddit Community

    One user, jimnantzstie, pointed out that Non D1 games only affect a team’s record and not their computer numbers or tournament resume. This implies that the competitive value of these games may be limited.

    Another user, SapCPark, mentioned that the most Non D1 games they’ve seen a team play is four, with low-major schools being more inclined towards this. Power 5 schools may schedule one or two, while mid-majors typically opt for fewer such games.

    Glittering-Safe1070 shared that Non D1 games are often scheduled for morale boosts rather than competitive reasons. However, they cautioned against excessively relying on these games, as the NCAA may intervene if perceived exploitation occurs.

    cardracer270 highlighted that some conferences, like the MVC, have specific regulations on Non-D1 games. The MVC allows only one such game, with Murray setting theirs as the season opener, providing an extended exhibition period.

    atomicmarc emphasized the negative impact of playing too many D2 schools on a team’s RPI, indicating that strategic scheduling is crucial for maintaining a favorable standing.

    In conclusion, the approach to scheduling Non-D1 opponents in NCAA basketball varies widely, from morale considerations to strategic implications. Finding the right balance between competitive advantage and fair play is essential in navigating these rules effectively.