MLB fans are divided on whether the league should create its own Hall of Fame to resolve controversies surrounding players like Pete Rose and Barry Bonds. The discussion raises questions about the influence of sports writers and the MLB’s stance on controversial figures.
Summary
- Proposal for MLB to establish a separate Hall of Fame for controversial players.
- Debate over the role of sports writers in Hall of Fame selections.
- Insight into MLB’s control over the Baseball Hall of Fame.
Fans Debate the Idea
While some fans support the idea of creating a separate Hall of Fame to honor players like Rose, Bonds, and others, others argue that MLB’s control would still exclude controversial figures like Rose due to his ban.
MLB’s Influence
Deepthoughtnaught points out the indirect influence of MLB on the Baseball Hall of Fame, highlighting how the league’s support is essential for the museum’s operation.
Opposing Views
Fallen_Heroes_Tavern expresses discontent with the idea of including players like Bonds and Clemens in any Hall of Fame, citing their alleged use of performance-enhancing drugs as a stain on their legacies.
The debate on creating a separate Hall of Fame for MLB continues among fans and raises questions about the integrity and inclusivity of such an institution.