LeBron James fans are in an uproar as he is left off the All-NBA Second Team, with Anthony Edwards, Kawhi Leonard, and Kevin Durant making the cut. Do voters have it all wrong?
Summary
- Debate surrounds LeBron James’ exclusion from the All-NBA Second Team.
- Fans question the voting logic behind rewarding lesser-seeded players over top performers.
- Some criticize the media’s voting accuracy and rationale.
- Voters are scrutinized for favoring players based on short-term performances.
LeBron Deserves Recognition
Many fans argue that LeBron James should have been included based on his consistent excellence throughout the season, questioning the criteria used for the selection process. One user pointed out the disparity in advanced metrics, highlighting LeBron’s ranking above the chosen players. The debate intensifies as fans defend LeBron’s undeniable impact on the game.
Media Bias or Genuine Vote?
Some fans view the voting decisions as biased or attention-seeking, suggesting that certain media personalities deviate from the norm to generate buzz. The mention of Chris Broussard and Stephen A. Smith sparks amusement, with fans acknowledging the unpredictability of award selections in the media landscape.
Questioning Voter Credibility
There is skepticism surrounding the credentials of voters, with a suggestion to include random Reddit contributors in the voting process for a fresh perspective. Fans express disappointment in the lack of accuracy and thorough analysis from traditional voters, indicating a desire for more transparent and merit-based selections.
People voting for Kawhi based on like a month and a half of high level play.
It should really be Lebron over Kawhi, he has not really had an All NBA 2 season at all.
7 out of 7 ballots has Naz Reid as 6th man. Feels bad for Monk 🙁