Kevin Durant: What Reddit Thinks About His Legacy

Is Kevin Durant a true NBA superstar, or just a “bus rider”? A Kevin Durant Reddit thread dives into this debate. Fans are dissecting his playoff performances and leadership. Some cite his two championships with Golden State. Others argue those wins came from the Warriors’ system, not Durant’s leadership. Let’s unpack this Kevin Durant Reddit conversation and explore both sides of the argument.

Kevin Durant has not led a team to the conference finals since playing with MVP PGs Westbrook and Curry. He is a liability with his ball handling, limited playmaking, and cannot defend opponent’s best players. KD is a bus rider and cannot carry a team like LBJ and Kawhi.
byu/MITWestbrook innba

Kevin Durant: A Quick Overview

  • User MITWestbrook claims that Durant relies on star teammates like Westbrook and Curry, not able to lead his own team to playoff success.
  • Comments touch on both support and criticism of Durant’s abilities, showcasing a mix of opinions on his standing as a player.
  • Discussion emphasizes the distinction between traditional forwards and playmaking heavy roles, suggesting that Durant should not be expected to carry the entire playmaking load.
  • The post ignited diverse reactions, engaging fans to reflect on Durant’s legacy and performance metrics.

Key Takeaways

  • Durant’s individual brilliance is undeniable, but questions about his leadership and playoff performance persist. Fans and analysts continue to debate whether he can consistently lead a team to success without another superstar by his side.
  • Evaluating Durant requires looking beyond individual stats. The impact of teammates, injuries, and evolving team dynamics should be considered when assessing his career trajectory and playoff outcomes.
  • The “bus rider” narrative is an oversimplification. While Durant benefited from playing with other elite players, this shouldn’t diminish his contributions to championship teams. A more nuanced perspective acknowledges the complexities of team dynamics and the various factors influencing playoff success.

Durant’s Early Career Dominance

Before we dive into the criticisms, let’s rewind. Remember KD in Oklahoma City? A four-time scoring champion, multiple All-NBA First Team selections, and leading his team deep into the playoffs—all before turning 25. He was a force of nature, consistently ranked just behind LeBron James. This Reddit thread captures the awe surrounding his early dominance, a period where he seemed destined for a top-10 all-time ranking. His length and agility made him a matchup nightmare, and his ability to create shots seemingly out of thin air was mesmerizing.

He wasn’t just racking up points; he was the focal point of a dynamic offense, showcasing an almost unstoppable scoring arsenal. This early success solidified his place as a generational talent and fueled expectations of continued dominance. He carried the team on his back, night after night, silencing any doubts about his ability to lead.

Setting the Stage for Greatness: Early Success and Sky-High Expectations

Kevin Durant’s early career was a whirlwind of achievements, setting the bar incredibly high. Four scoring titles, multiple All-NBA First Team selections, and deep playoff runs with the Oklahoma City Thunder—all before he turned 25. He was a constant presence in MVP conversations, often ranked just behind LeBron James, solidifying his status as a future Hall of Famer. His length, agility, and shot-creating ability were mesmerizing. This Reddit thread perfectly captures the awe surrounding his early dominance, a time when a top-10 all-time ranking seemed inevitable.

“Second My Whole Life”: Durant’s Drive and Early Career Frustrations

Despite the accolades and early success, a sense of frustration simmered beneath the surface for Durant. He’s spoken openly about feeling perpetually second—second best player in high school, second pick in the draft, runner-up for MVP. This sentiment, captured in this Reddit discussion, reveals a deep-seated drive to transcend the “second place” narrative. This constant striving to prove himself has undoubtedly fueled his ambition and shaped his approach to the game, pushing him to solidify his legacy among the NBA’s elite. It’s a complex dynamic, adding another layer to the ongoing debate about his place in basketball history. Check out SirShanksAlot’s coverage of other sports controversies for more in-depth analysis.

How Durant’s Style Has Evolved

The narrative shifts when we examine Durant’s career post-Warriors. The same Reddit discussion highlights the stark contrast between his early promise and his later struggles to replicate that same level of postseason success. Injuries, of course, played a role, particularly his Achilles tear. But even when healthy, his time with the Nets and Suns has been marked by early playoff exits, raising questions about his ability to lead a team without another superstar by his side. Some argue that his reliance on isolation plays and jump shooting, while undeniably effective, has come at the expense of other aspects of his game.

The criticism of his defense, ball-handling, and playmaking, as mentioned in the original Reddit post, becomes more pronounced when he’s not surrounded by the offensive firepower of a Steph Curry or a prime Russell Westbrook. It’s a complex evolution, and one that continues to fuel debate among fans and analysts. Is he a “bus rider,” as some suggest, or simply a victim of circumstance and unfortunate injuries? The conversation continues. For a broader perspective on how individual performance is perceived in professional sports, check out SirShanksAlot’s coverage of other sports controversies, like this piece on Carlos Alcaraz or this article discussing Shohei Ohtani.

Is Kevin Durant a Lockdown Defender?

One of the most prominent points in the Reddit conversation is Durant’s perceived deficiencies in defense. The original poster (OP) provides examples from recent games, arguing that Durant frequently fails to guard effectively, leaving his teammates vulnerable. As one user, Syndana23, points out, not every elite scorer can double as a top-tier defender. They argue, “Most pure scoring forwards aren’t successful without a lead PG.” This perspective underlines a larger debate in basketball regarding the multifaceted roles players should assume versus their traditional positions. While Durant has been lauded for his scoring, the critique suggests that his defensive flaws have too often overshadowed his offensive talent. Highlighting turning points in games, the OP provides a visual breakdown of mistakes—like failing to revert back quickly on transition defense. This has led to some heated discussions about whether KD can be trusted in high-stakes playoff moments.

Can Kevin Durant Really Run the Point?

The OP’s assertion that Durant is a liability in terms of ball handling and playmaking resonates with several users. They cite crucial play-off situations where Durant has either turned the ball over or failed to make pivotal plays. HoeImOddyNuff humorously remarked, “Did you watch the Nets vs Bucks 2021 playoff series? Because them not getting to the Conference finals was absolutely not his fault.” This adds layers to the argument, as it hints at the complexities of assigning blame when multiple factors often lead to a team’s playoff demise. Users are divided here; some hold Durant responsible for the failures, while others suggest that injuries to teammates or the quality of opponents often define playoff success. The two sides create an interesting dynamic, underscoring how plays from a single game can swing fan opinions about a player’s greatness.

Durant’s Playmaking: Strengths and Weaknesses

The debate surrounding Kevin Durant’s playmaking abilities is multifaceted, with many fans and analysts weighing in on his effectiveness in high-pressure situations. A key point raised by Reddit user MITWestbrook is that Durant hasn’t led a team to the conference finals since playing with MVP point guards Russell Westbrook and Stephen Curry. This observation suggests Durant may struggle to carry a team independently, often relying on the playmaking skills of superstar teammates for playoff success. As MITWestbrook states, “He is a liability with his ball handling, limited playmaking, and cannot defend opponent’s best players.” (Source)

This conversation highlights broader issues about the expectations placed on players like Durant. User Syndana23 notes, “Most pure scoring forwards aren’t successful without a lead PG,” emphasizing that traditional basketball roles often dictate how a player’s contributions are perceived. (Source) This raises questions about whether Durant’s skill set aligns with the demands of a primary playmaker, especially in crucial playoff moments. Similar dynamics exist in other sports; we’ve explored the interplay between strategy and individual brilliance in pickleball over on SirShanksAlot.

The Reddit discussion also touches on specific instances where Durant’s playmaking has drawn scrutiny. Users point to crucial turnovers and missed opportunities in high-stakes games, suggesting his performance hasn’t always met expectations. This ongoing debate reflects the complexities of evaluating a player’s legacy, especially the interplay of individual talent and team dynamics in pursuing playoff success. It’s reminiscent of the Carlos Alcaraz controversy we covered, where individual actions had significant repercussions.

How Kevin Durant Fits Within a Team

A significant portion of the conversation revolves around team dynamics and how they shape a player’s legacy. As pointed out by users like beary_neutral, who pressed for evidence of Westbrook’s playoff performance without the help of superstar players, the dialogue shifts from solely evaluating Durant to looking at those around him. This leads to broader debates about what it means to lead a team versus coasting off of teammates’ success. The narrative that highlights ”bus riders” vs. ”bus drivers” in basketball lore links directly to how fans and analysts judge player value. This ongoing assessment raises the question: should achievements be viewed in isolation, or do team compositions play an equally critical role in understanding a player’s contributions to their team’s success? The conversation continues to evolve, as fans consider how to weigh individual talent against collective efforts.

The “Bus Rider” Narrative: Exploring the Nuances

The “bus rider” narrative surrounding Kevin Durant comes from the idea that his championship wins are tied to playing with other MVP-level players. This viewpoint suggests Durant benefited significantly from playing with Russell Westbrook and Steph Curry, achieving a level of success he hasn’t replicated as the primary star. User u/MITWestbrook on Reddit frames Durant as someone who coasts on the success of star teammates, rather than driving the team forward. This perspective often overlooks the team-oriented nature of basketball—even Michael Jordan needed Scottie Pippen. It’s a complex issue with valid points on both sides, and it’s something we often discuss on SirShanksAlot regarding various sports. For example, our recent article on Carlos Alcaraz explores similar controversies around individual performance. These discussions about individual talent versus team dynamics are always interesting.

Durant’s Team Choices: Joining Established Powers and the “Bus Rider” Label

The “bus rider” narrative around Kevin Durant stems from the idea that his championship wins are tied to playing with other MVP-caliber players like Russell Westbrook and Steph Curry (Source). This viewpoint suggests he achieved a level of success he hasn’t replicated as the primary star. One Reddit user, u/MITWestbrook, frames Durant as someone who coasts on the success of star teammates, rather than driving the team forward (Source). This perspective often overlooks how team-oriented basketball is—even Michael Jordan needed Scottie Pippen. This “bus rider” vs. “bus driver” debate directly influences how we judge player value (Source). It’s a complex issue, especially when considering the impact of individual actions on a team, similar to what we discussed earlier with Carlos Alcaraz.

Alternative Paths: How Would Durant’s Legacy Look with OKC Championships?

Had Durant won championships with Oklahoma City, his all-time ranking would likely be much higher, potentially landing him in the top 12 (Source). The debate continues around whether he can consistently lead a team to success without another superstar (Source). This discussion highlights the complexities of evaluating a player’s legacy, especially the interplay of individual talent and team dynamics in playoff success (Source). This isn’t just a basketball conversation; here at SirShanksAlot, we explore similar themes in other sports. Check out our articles on the dynamics of team play in golf or the impact of individual decisions on team relocations.

How Teammates and Injuries Impact Durant

Conversations about Durant’s performance often include the impact of teammates and injuries. Reddit user u/HoeImOddyNuff mentioned the 2021 Nets vs. Bucks playoff series, questioning if the Nets’ failure to reach the Conference Finals rested solely on Durant’s shoulders. This highlights a crucial point: injuries and team composition significantly affect playoff outcomes. Durant has faced difficulties, including injuries to key teammates, impacting his team’s playoff runs. It’s hard to isolate Durant’s performance and blame him entirely for playoff exits when other factors are at play. This reminds me of our SirShanksAlot piece on Shohei Ohtani’s 50/50 ball auction—sometimes external factors heavily influence the narrative.

Durant and Westbrook: A Two-Way Street?

Kevin Durant and Russell Westbrook’s time in Oklahoma City adds another layer to the “bus rider” narrative. Reddit user u/beary_neutral asked a valid question: how did Westbrook perform in the playoffs without a superstar teammate? This starts a crucial discussion about the relationship between star players. Did Westbrook elevate Durant, or vice-versa? It’s likely both. Their partnership led to deep playoff runs but no championship. This makes us wonder if either player could have achieved the same success alone. It’s similar to discussions on SirShanksAlot about team dynamics in other sports, like the interplay between cut shots and topspins in pickleball, discussed in our article on Mari Humberg. A partnership’s success often depends on the complementary skills of both individuals.

Durant’s Warriors Years: Lasting Impact

Durant’s time with the Golden State Warriors is central to discussions about his legacy. While he won two championships, some argue that he joined an already successful team, lessening his accomplishments. One Reddit comment highlighted Durant’s lack of “true postseason success” after Golden State, implying his Warriors championships were less meaningful. This ignores Durant’s crucial role in those wins, earning Finals MVP twice. It’s complex, raising questions about how we evaluate individual contributions within a team. This is similar to our SirShanksAlot discussions about team relocations, like the Oakland Athletics’ move to Las Vegas, and how these changes impact fan loyalty and team identity.

Kevin Durant: What Reddit and the Media Are Saying

The opinions expressed in the comments section demonstrate that public perception surrounding a player’s legacy is often shaped by both their performance and their narrative arcs. Many users echo sentiments that Durant has been unfairly characterized in comparisons to legendary players like LeBron or Jordan. The discussion indirectly highlights how popular media plays a part in shaping player reputations, frequently pigeonholing them into roles that may not reflect their true abilities. As some emphasized, Durant’s role as a traditional scorer does not inherently make him a failure when compared to the all-around gameplay seen in some of his contemporaries. This perspective invites fans to rethink how they define greatness and the nuances of player evaluation. In a league where narratives can shift overnight, exploring how sentiments on KD parallel or diverge from groups of fans across the league truly showcases basketball’s passionate base。

Kevin Durant’s performance and legacy remain hot-button issues among basketball fans. His skills as a scorer are rarely questioned, yet underlying concerns about his defensive liabilities and performing without superstar support persistently emerge. Fans continue to engage in lively exchanges that examine whether Durant can stand shoulder-to-shoulder with the legends of the game or if he will forever be seen as a player who thrived alongside companions, rather than leading the charge himself.

Durant’s Legacy: Ranking and Comparisons

Discussions about Kevin Durant’s legacy are complex. A Reddit thread recently sparked debate, claiming Durant’s career trajectory hasn’t met expectations. The author argues Durant was projected to be the second-best player of his generation, but currently sits around sixth, behind LeBron James, Stephen Curry, Nikola Jokić, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Kawhi Leonard. The thread even speculates that rising stars like Jayson Tatum and Luka Dončić might surpass him, potentially pushing him down to eighth. This fuels the ongoing conversation about Durant’s place among the NBA’s elite.

Durant’s Ranking Amongst the Greats: Where Does He Stand?

One of the most heated debates surrounding Kevin Durant is his ranking among the all-time NBA greats. A Reddit thread recently ignited this discussion, with one user claiming Durant was “supposed to be #2 in his own era.” The author argues he’s currently ranked around sixth, behind LeBron James, Stephen Curry, Nikola Jokic, Giannis Antetokounmpo, and Kawhi Leonard. They even suggest that younger stars like Jayson Tatum and Luka Dončić could eventually surpass him. This sparks a larger conversation: how do we measure greatness in basketball? Is it purely based on individual skill, championships, or a combination of both? Durant’s career, marked by incredible scoring prowess yet punctuated by questions surrounding his leadership and playoff success, makes this a particularly complex question.

Skill vs. Accomplishments: A Constant Debate in Durant’s Career

The debate around Durant often boils down to skill versus accomplishments. Some argue his pure basketball skill, particularly his scoring ability, places him near the top of the all-time list. Others contend that his championship record, compared to players like LeBron or Jordan, justifies a lower ranking—somewhere between 15 and 20 (source). This discrepancy highlights the challenge of evaluating players in a team sport. Another point raised in the same Reddit discussion is a “what if” scenario: if Durant had won championships with Oklahoma City, his ranking would likely be significantly higher, potentially landing him in the top 12. This adds another layer to the debate, suggesting that team context and circumstance play a crucial role in shaping a player’s legacy and how we perceive their impact on the court.

Comparing Durant to Other Stars: A Broader Perspective

Comparing Durant to other stars inevitably leads to discussions about the “bus rider” narrative—the idea that some players achieve success by “riding” the coattails of a dominant teammate or system. This narrative is often used to diminish Durant’s accomplishments with the Golden State Warriors, suggesting he simply benefited from an already established dynasty (source). However, this oversimplifies the complexities of team dynamics and individual contributions. As we’ve explored on SirShanksAlot, similar debates arise in other sports. For example, discussions around individual performance versus team strategy in pickleball highlight this tension. Ultimately, evaluating a player’s legacy requires a nuanced understanding of their skills, accomplishments, and the context in which they played. It’s not as simple as labeling someone a “bus rider” or a “bus driver.” The ongoing assessment of Durant raises a crucial question: should achievements be viewed in isolation, or do team compositions play an equally critical role (source)?

Has Kevin Durant Underachieved?

Another Reddit discussion questions whether Durant has underachieved since leaving the Golden State Warriors. The post highlights his lack of significant postseason success over the past four years, with the exception of one strong series against the Milwaukee Bucks. It contrasts this with his earlier career trajectory, which, based on his stats and accolades, suggested he was on track to become a potential top-10 player. This raises questions about whether injuries, team dynamics, or other factors have hindered his progress and overall legacy.

The Case for Underachievement: Unfulfilled Potential and Relative Disappointment

The conversation around Kevin Durant’s supposed underachievement is complex. It’s tied to the incredibly high expectations set early in his career. Remember, this is a four-time scoring champion, someone who consistently dominated the league. He was frequently ranked just behind LeBron James, seemingly destined for a top-10 all-time ranking. This early success fueled a particular narrative, one where anything short of multiple championships and consistent Finals appearances feels like a letdown.

The narrative shifts when we consider his post-Warriors career. One Reddit thread perfectly captures this sentiment, noting that four years after leaving Golden State, Durant hasn’t seen the same level of postseason success. While injuries, like his Achilles tear, undoubtedly played a role, his time with the Nets and Suns has been marked by early playoff exits. This has led some to question his ability to lead a team without another established superstar. Another Reddit discussion ranked him around sixth best of his generation, a significant drop from the projected second-best. It’s a stark contrast to his early career dominance and raises legitimate questions about whether his career has lived up to its initial promise. This sentiment is further echoed in discussions on Durant’s perceived reliance on other MVP-caliber players.

Durant’s Advantages: A Look at His Early Career Support

While the criticisms of Durant’s later career are valid, it’s important to acknowledge the advantages he had early on. In Oklahoma City, he played alongside Russell Westbrook, another MVP-caliber player. This dynamic duo consistently led the Thunder deep into the playoffs, providing Durant with valuable experience and a supportive system. Having Westbrook by his side undoubtedly contributed to his early success, allowing him to flourish as a scorer and develop his game within a winning environment.

Then, of course, there’s the Golden State Warriors era. Joining a team with established stars like Steph Curry, Klay Thompson, and Draymond Green provided Durant with an unparalleled level of support. While his two championships with the Warriors are often used against him in the “bus rider” narrative, it’s undeniable that this environment maximized his strengths. He played within a well-oiled system, surrounded by elite shooters and playmakers. This context is crucial when evaluating his career trajectory. His time with the Warriors, while undeniably successful, also contributed to the perception that he needs a superstar team to win it all. It’s a complex issue with no easy answers, and one that continues to shape the debate surrounding his legacy. Similar discussions about team dynamics and individual performance often arise in other sports, a topic frequently explored on SirShanksAlot, such as in this piece about the Oakland A’s relocation or this article on pickleball strategy.

Comparing Kevin Durant and Anthony Edwards

While not directly related to the initial Reddit post, comparisons between Durant and younger players like Anthony Edwards add another layer to the conversation. Some fans, as seen in this Reddit thread, acknowledge Durant’s exceptional skills but question his ranking due to a relatively lower championship count compared to other top players. This highlights the different criteria used to evaluate players—some prioritize individual brilliance, while others emphasize team accomplishments. It begs the question: how do we define greatness in basketball? Is it individual skill or team success?

Beyond the Court: Other Reddit Discussions About Kevin Durant

Across various Reddit communities, the consensus is that Durant’s talent is undeniable. However, his ranking remains a subject of ongoing debate. Factors like his championship record and certain career moves contribute to the divided opinions. This Reddit thread exemplifies the range of perspectives, with no single, universally accepted ranking. The discussions often extend beyond statistics, delving into intangibles like leadership and impact on team dynamics. It’s clear that Durant’s legacy is still being written, and fan opinions continue to evolve as his career unfolds. Perhaps Sir Shanksalot readers have some thoughts on the matter? Let us know in the comments below!

Related Articles

Check Out More Sports Commentary and Analysis at SirShanksAlot.com

Want more engaging sports discussions? Head over to SirShanksAlot.com for diverse sports coverage, from fan reactions and player controversies to humorous sports anecdotes. We blend in-depth analysis with lighthearted storytelling. Explore articles like “A Heartfelt Goodbye to the Oakland A’s” (read more) or the comical misadventures of a lost golf cart (check out the story). We also offer insights into various sports, like this piece on mixing cut shots and topspins in pickleball (learn more). Whether you’re a seasoned sports enthusiast or just looking for a fun read, SirShanksAlot has something for you. Join the conversation!

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Kevin Durant solely responsible for his teams’ playoff exits?

Team dynamics, injuries, and the strength of opponents all contribute to playoff outcomes. It’s difficult to place the blame entirely on one player, even a star like Durant. Basketball is a team sport, and playoff success relies on collective effort.

How does Durant’s playing style impact his team’s performance?

Durant’s scoring prowess is undeniable, but his reliance on isolation plays and jump shooting can be a double-edged sword. While effective, this style can sometimes limit his teammates’ involvement in the offense. The balance between individual brilliance and team play is a constant discussion in basketball.

Why is Durant’s defense often criticized?

While an elite scorer, Durant’s defense isn’t always considered top-tier. Critics point to instances where his defensive lapses have cost his team. This raises questions about his overall impact, especially in crucial playoff moments. It also highlights the challenge of excelling on both ends of the court.

How do the “bus rider” and “bus driver” labels apply to Durant?

The “bus rider” narrative suggests Durant needs other star players to win championships, while a “bus driver” carries their team to success. Durant’s time with the Warriors fuels this debate, as he won championships alongside established stars. However, this overlooks his significant contributions to those championship teams.

How should we evaluate Durant’s legacy?

Evaluating Durant’s legacy requires considering various factors: his scoring titles, championships, individual skills, and team dynamics. It’s a complex discussion with no easy answers. Ultimately, how we weigh these factors shapes our perspective on his place among the NBA greats.