Stephen A Smith and Bob Myers as serious analysts for the NBA draft? Let the Reddit debate begin!
Summary
- Fans question the credibility of ESPN’s choice in analysts, expecting more expertise.
- Some defend Bob Myers’ drafting experience as valuable for coverage.
- Stephen A Smith’s polarizing presence divides viewers, with many choosing to switch channels.
Debate on ESPN’s Analysts
Some fans feel ESPN’s NBA draft coverage lacks the expertise they expect, pointing out Stephen A Smith and Bob Myers’ shortcomings in providing in-depth analysis. They question why figures like Mel Kiper are not included, expressing disappointment in the direction of the broadcast.
Defending Bob Myers
Contrary opinions defend Bob Myers’ credibility, citing his background as a former basketball president with substantial drafting experience. They argue that having an ex-GM adds valuable insight to the draft coverage, offering a different perspective than traditional analysts.
Stephen A Smith’s Impact
Stephen A Smith’s presence evokes strong reactions, with viewers either appreciating his entertaining style or finding it off-putting. Some admit to changing channels when they see him on TV, indicating a divide in how his persona is perceived by the audience.
Real ones remember that Stephen A Smith used to get bullied on draft night, showcasing a mix of humor and nostalgia among fans. The sentiment towards ESPN’s analysts remains split, with varying opinions on the suitability of their contributions to the NBA draft coverage.