Emma Raducanu’s stunning US Open victory sparked a debate on whether it was the best Grand Slam performance in the 21st century. Users on Reddit shared varied opinions, praising her achievement while also pointing out the competition she faced. Let’s dive into the conversation.
Summary
- Users debated whether Raducanu’s win was the greatest, citing the level of competition she faced.
- Some argued that other players had tougher routes to the finals with victories over established champions.
- While Raducanu’s win was surprising, some felt it did not rank as the best due to her lack of previous championship titles.
- Despite the differing opinions, many praised Raducanu’s victory and wished her continued success in her career.
Positive Sentiment
Many users applauded Raducanu’s incredible achievement, hailing her as a rising star in women’s tennis. They praised her composure and skill on the court, especially considering her qualifier status.
Negative Sentiment
Others felt that while Raducanu’s win was impressive, it did not outweigh the accomplishments of players who faced tougher competition and had more consistent performances throughout their careers.
User Insights
One user highlighted Leylah Fernandez’s victories over top-ranked players to emphasize the difficulty of her path to the finals, contrasting it with Raducanu’s opponents. Another user raised doubts about Raducanu’s championship pedigree, noting her lack of wins against top 10 players.