ESPN recently aired postgame coverage that left hockey fans shaking their heads in disappointment. From inaccurate team references to awkward sentences, the segment missed the mark.
Summary
- Viewers express frustration over ESPN’s lackluster postgame coverage.
- Concerns raised about inaccurate information and neglect of hockey.
- Fans discuss shortcomings in coverage such as wrong team mentions and awkward scripting.
Disappointment with ESPN
Many users criticized ESPN for its poor postgame coverage of hockey, highlighting the challenges of covering the sport. User Funky_Cows mentioned, “Covering hockey is hard,” emphasizing the complexities involved in providing accurate and engaging coverage.
Inaccuracies and Neglect
Several comments pointed out inaccuracies in ESPN’s coverage, with user L_viathan highlighting errors in team mentions and awkward sentences. The neglect towards hockey was also a recurring theme, as user Ninjapig151 expressed disappointment in the lack of effort put into scripting the anchor’s dialogue.
Shortcomings and Awkwardness
Users like Gods_call and xxfatpigxx highlighted specific instances of ESPN’s shortcomings, from budget inquiries during the show to swapping commentators mid-call. The awkwardness of the coverage was evident, with comments like, “Listen we were able to get Sean McDonough swapped out for Bob Wischusen on the call what more do you want from them?” showcasing the dissatisfaction among viewers.