A controversial tackle by Tomas Aviles has sparked a heated debate among fans. The incident in question has divided opinions on whether it warranted a red card. Let’s dive into the discussion.
Summary
- Fans are split on whether Aviles’ tackle was dangerous enough to warrant a red card.
- Many users criticize the tackle for being reckless, with both feet off the ground.
- Some believe the tackle could have caused serious injury and should result in a lengthy ban.
Was It Reckless?
Commenters like PlebBot69 and galactic_crewzer express shock at the tackle, citing the dangerous nature of Aviles’ challenge. PlebBot69 emphasizes the lack of control in the tackle, while galactic_crewzer describes it as scissoring the plant leg with significant force, insisting it should have been a red without question.
VAR Controversy
Skulldor138 questions why the Video Assistant Referee (VAR) didn’t recommend a review, considering the tackle’s severity. The user argues that such serious foul play should have warranted a closer look, highlighting a potential flaw in the officiating process.
Implications for Aviles
Alex-bello offers a nuanced perspective, acknowledging Aviles’ inconsistency on the field. The user notes that while Aviles can make brilliant tackles, he is also prone to boneheaded plays, exemplified by the controversial incident. This prompts a broader discussion on Aviles’ performance and decision-making.