A graphic designer’s ranking of City Connects baseball jerseys has fans buzzing with agreement and disagreement over the aesthetic choices.
Summary
- City Connects jerseys elicit divided opinions among fans.
- Some fans feel the rankings are spot on, while others strongly disagree.
- Commenters critique both the concept and execution of the designs.
- Individual preferences play a significant role in determining the perceived success of each jersey.
Fans’ Reactions
One user sarcastically quips, ‘Of all the charts in the world, this is one of them,’ highlighting the subjectivity of aesthetic preferences.
Another commenter expresses disbelief at the low creativity rating given to the Rangers’ jersey, emphasizing the intricate details that went into its design.
Amidst the criticisms, a fan jokingly points out that the Chicago White Sox jersey is ‘the only good thing [their] ChiSox got going,’ showcasing a sense of humor in evaluating the rankings.
Critiques and Counterpoints
Some fans challenge the rankings, with one remarking, ‘Your brother has shit taste,’ reflecting a strong negative sentiment towards the designer’s assessments.
Another commenter delves into specific details, questioning why certain teams’ jerseys did not align with expected motifs, such as the Cubs’ incorporation of ivy or the Astros’ use of orange for an astronaut theme.
One fan argues that the ranking lacks research, particularly in terms of concept grading for certain teams like the Padres, indicating a dissatisfaction with the thoroughness of the assessment.
Final Thoughts
The debate surrounding the graphic designer’s ranking of City Connects baseball jerseys showcases the diverse opinions held by fans. While some find merit in the assessments, others critique the lack of research, execution flaws, and personal biases influencing the rankings. Ultimately, the subjective nature of aesthetic preferences in sports design continues to spark lively discussions among fans.