In a feisty post on Reddit, user MysteriousEdge5643 shed light on Boise State Athletic Director Jeremiah Dickey’s thoughts about the College Football Playoff (CFP) format change. Dickey’s comments about the need for a ‘Boise State policy’ drew attention, as he emphasized that legacy matters while also expressing a determination to break through a system that seems designed to hold teams like Boise State back. With a call to ‘fight like hell,’ Dickey’s passion for the program was clear, embodying the spirit of ‘Always What’s Next!’ and the belief in their capability to achieve greatness.
Summary
- Dickey’s remarks resonate deeply with fans who feel that Boise State has been overlooked in the CFP.
- The subreddit discussions highlight a mix of support, skepticism, and frustration regarding the treatment of mid-major programs.
- Some users express doubt that mid-major teams will achieve favorable treatment under the new format.
- The post reveals a broader discussion about the inequality in college football, resonating with many fans across various schools.
The Passion Behind Boise State’s Call for Change
Boise State has always prided itself on being an underdog in college football, and Dickey’s comments ignite that fire within its fan base. The quote, “when the system is created to keep you down, you fight like hell to break it,” reverberated with those who have followed the ups and downs of the program. It’s not just talk; it’s a rallying cry. Fans relate to the feeling of being underestimated and overlooked, which stirs up an emotional response. The spirit of determination to keep striving despite systemic challenges is a core value that resonates with not only Boise State fans but with anyone who has ever felt disadvantaged. As SparkMaster360 commented, there may be some feelings of bitterness beneath the surface—suggesting that the fan bases of other teams might be upset about Boise getting what they believe to be preferential treatment.
Community Response: Mixed Feelings and Frustrations
As the post gained traction, users expressed a range of opinions—both in support of Dickey and doubting the feasibility of meaningful change. Comments like that from nayelirain revealed a common frustration: the limitations placed on Group of Five (G5) programs within the college football landscape. “It’s wild that before the season even starts and a single game is played, the highest seed a G5 team can hope for now is 9th,” they lamented. This underscores a palpable sense of resignation that resonates widely in the subreddit. Fans are well aware of the uphill battle that remains for their teams within a system that favors Power Five (P5) teams, regardless of their performance on the field. The implications of the newly proposed format have only exacerbated that frustration, suggesting that G5 teams are destined for second-rate treatment and minimal consideration.
The Boise State Legacy and Its Importance
Dickey’s mention of the legacy of Boise State is essential. Their history of success is not just a talking point; it’s something tangible that the community clings to—a beacon of what’s possible. Many students, alumni, and fans remember the days of stunning upsets and unforgettable plays that put Boise State on the national map. CLU_Three made a comment echoing what many are feeling: “It doesn’t really feel better when they name stuff after your team.” This suggests a belief that mere recognition doesn’t equate to respect or equality in the grand structure of college football. The legacy is important, but it will take more than good intentions and nostalgia for Boise State to be treated on equitable terms with the bigger programs. There’s a hunger in the community for something more meaningful than mere acknowledgment; they want real opportunities within the existing framework.
The Future for Boise State in the CFP Landscape
So where does this sentiment leave Boise State, and indeed the entire G5 conferences? As discussions unfold surrounding the revamped CFP format, fans and experts alike are eager to see how things will pan out. There’s a certain incredulity toward the idea that a mid-major could ever compete at the highest level given the current structure, creating a sense of ambivalence among fans. The hesitation in the community, illustrated by comments like that of EmuMan10, reflects the larger question about whether mid-major teams can ever hope to rise above the imposed glass ceiling. “Big 2 conference fans reading this >:( Everyone else :)” captures how divisive this issue feels among college football fandoms. The implication here, laden with sarcasm, highlights the stark differences in how various schools and conferences are viewed in the broader context of the sport.
Despite some of the negative sentiments expressed, the Boise State community remains steadfastly hopeful. Dickey’s impassioned rhetoric provides a spark that many fans seem eager to rally around, united by a common cause. As Boise State continues to navigate the complexities of the CFP landscape, the tension between their legacy and the limitations imposed by the structure feels as pressing as ever. From fights to be recognized to grievances about the system’s fairness, the discussions continue as fervently as the game itself. In the end, the journey of Boise State exemplifies more than just rivalries; it highlights the ongoing quest for respect and recognition amid a playing field that often feels rigged against underdogs. The outcome may remain unclear, but one thing is for sure—Boise State and its fanbase are not backing down anytime soon.