Discover why the Big Ten and SEC are unlikely to add Florida State as a new member and why fans believe FSU may be a disruptive partner in college football.
Summary
- Financial considerations play a crucial role in the Big Ten and SEC’s decision-making.
- Fans see FSU as a potential disruptive partner in conference realignment.
- Previous cases like Oregon/Washington add skepticism to the credibility of the news.
- The SEC’s recent addition of Texas raises questions about their stance on disruptive partners.
Fan Reactions
One fan humorously compared the situation to leaving a spouse for a new partner, highlighting the complexities of conference expansion.
Another fan remarked on FSU being labeled as a disruptive partner and its potential impact on future conference affiliations.
McMurphy’s Reports
Users questioned the accuracy of McMurphy’s reports, drawing parallels to past cases and expressing doubts about the sources’ credibility.
One fan mentioned the tactical maneuvers involved in conference negotiations, hinting that financial deals might influence decisions more than stated reasons.
The debate over FSU’s status as a disruptive partner continued, with comparisons to other universities like Texas and USC surfacing.
The conflicting narratives surrounding FSU’s potential move showcased the uncertainties and complexities in collegiate sports realignment.