Debating the accuracy of soccer player ratings from apps, some fans believe they are misleading as they can’t measure intangible aspects of the game. Others defend the ratings, citing statistical dominance. Here’s a breakdown of the discussion:
Summary
- Some fans doubt the accuracy of algorithm-based player ratings.
- Others argue that statistical dominance justifies high ratings.
- Critics believe apps cannot measure intangible aspects of player performance.
- Debate sparked over the inclusion/exclusion of players in the rated team.
Debating the Algorithm
Many fans, like Greenfrogwallet, express skepticism towards algorithm-based ratings. They highlight discrepancies between app ratings and on-field performances, citing examples like Foden’s controversially high rating despite perceived poor gameplay.
Supporting the Ratings
Contrary to skeptics, some fans defend the ratings. Supporters, such as AutoModerator, argue that statistical analysis provides an objective measure of player performance, despite its limitations.
Intangible Aspects of the Game
Contributors like downfallndirtydeeds emphasize the importance of intangible elements that algorithms may overlook. They point out instances where a player’s impact goes beyond measurable stats, questioning the comprehensive nature of rating apps.
Player Selection Controversy
Disputes arise over the selection of players in the rated team. Fans like David_b98 express dissatisfaction with the team composition, citing Germany’s underrepresentation despite strong performances, sparking further debate.