Players in the pickleball community are sounding off on the brevity of tournaments, sparking a debate on value and playtime in competitive events.
Summary
- Value per minute of playtime questioned
- Disappointment expressed over pricey entry fees
- Suggestions made for longer matches or adjusted pricing
- Comparison drawn with other sports’ tournament structures
Value or Vanity?
Many players express concerns over the cost-benefit ratio, citing short game times versus hefty entry fees as a primary issue. While some acknowledge the need for event organizers to turn a profit, the sentiment leans towards wanting more on-court action for the price paid.
Playing the Price
Players weigh in on their tournament experiences, sharing anecdotes of feeling short-changed by brief match durations despite significant financial investments. The debate revolves around striking a balance between affordability and adequate playtime in competitive settings.
Game, Set, Mismatch
Comparisons to other sports tournaments highlight the discrepancy in playtime versus cost, with pickleball enthusiasts questioning the current tournament structures and advocating for adjustments to enhance the overall player experience